Triple
T28211615
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle |
E711183
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | work on electoral systems |
C4736
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: work on electoral systems Context triple: [Système pratique et raisonné de représentation proportionnelle, instanceOf, work on electoral systems]
-
A.
electoral process
The electoral process is the structured sequence of activities, rules, and institutions through which citizens select representatives or decide public issues by casting and counting votes.
-
B.
electoral reform proposal
An electoral reform proposal is a structured plan outlining specific changes to an existing electoral system to improve its fairness, representation, efficiency, or integrity.
-
C.
work in social choice theory
chosen
Work in social choice theory examines how individual preferences can be aggregated into collective decisions, analyzing the fairness, consistency, and implications of different voting and choice mechanisms.
-
D.
party system in United States politics
The party system in United States politics is the evolving structure of political competition and governance organized primarily around two major parties—Democrats and Republicans—that shape electoral choices, policy agendas, and political identities.
-
E.
voting behavior theory
Voting behavior theory examines how and why individuals make electoral choices by analyzing the influence of psychological, sociological, economic, and institutional factors on their decision-making.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51cb5288190818c1f63a266af11 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:39 p.m.