Triple
T28211428
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | House of Representatives elections (usually concurrent) |
E711178
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeHeldSeparatelyFrom |
P186453
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Senate elections |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Senate elections | Statement: [House of Representatives elections (usually concurrent), canBeHeldSeparatelyFrom, Senate elections]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeHeldSeparatelyFrom Context triple: [House of Representatives elections (usually concurrent), canBeHeldSeparatelyFrom, Senate elections]
-
A.
canBeHeldWith
Indicates that two entities are compatible or suitable to be held or used together at the same time.
-
B.
canBeHeld
Indicates that an entity is capable of being physically grasped, supported, or carried by another entity.
-
C.
soldSeparatelyFrom
Indicates that one item is not included with another and must be purchased or obtained independently.
-
D.
canBeHeldIn
Indicates that one entity is capable of being contained, hosted, or conducted within another entity.
-
E.
canBeSplitAmong
Indicates that something is divisible into parts that can be distributed among multiple recipients or groups.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efb51cb5288190818c1f63a266af11 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 7:12 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f9fe1a1ca4819084c196f0041f0be2 |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:26 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7cf769338819092a5f42653dcc956 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:43 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f9fd66eed48190bdc26a8def328c2d |
completed | May 5, 2026, 2:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:39 p.m.