Triple

T28198484
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 1992 New Zealand electoral reform referendum E716508 entity
Predicate proposedElectoralSystem P539 FINISHED
Object Mixed-Member Proportional representation NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mixed-Member Proportional representation | Statement: [1992 New Zealand electoral reform referendum, proposedElectoralSystem, Mixed-Member Proportional representation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposedElectoralSystem
Context triple: [1992 New Zealand electoral reform referendum, proposedElectoralSystem, Mixed-Member Proportional representation]
  • A. electoralSystemPreference
    Indicates a relationship where an entity expresses a favored or chosen type of electoral system over other possible systems.
  • B. electoralSystemConcerned
    Indicates that something is related to, affected by, or focused on a particular electoral system.
  • C. electionMethod chosen
    Indicates the process or system used to select a candidate or make a decision in an election.
  • D. electoralSystemAtCreation
    Indicates the type of electoral system that was in place at the time an entity (such as a political body or office) was originally established.
  • E. changedElectoralSystem
    Indicates that an entity has altered or replaced a previously existing electoral system with a different one.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efd6b612f48190a72012b520afbd10 completed April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a8df16a88190a23820e64a3b1f92 completed May 3, 2026, 1:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6a751d5e48190a77dcecbe7ef9f0b completed May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:29 p.m.