Triple

T28141108
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Internal Security Act, 1982 E714343 entity
Predicate replacedOrConsolidated P178786 FINISHED
Object earlier South African security legislation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: earlier South African security legislation | Statement: [Internal Security Act, 1982, replacedOrConsolidated, earlier South African security legislation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: replacedOrConsolidated
Context triple: [Internal Security Act, 1982, replacedOrConsolidated, earlier South African security legislation]
  • A. consolidatedUnder
    Indicates that one entity has been merged into and is now formally part of another, typically larger or parent, entity.
  • B. consolidatedAs
    Indicates that one entity has been combined, merged, or unified into another entity to form a single consolidated whole.
  • C. replacedBecause
    Indicates that one entity has been substituted for another specifically due to a particular reason or cause.
  • D. consolidatedBy
    Indicates that one entity has been merged, unified, or combined into a more cohesive whole by another entity.
  • E. consolidatedAfter
    Indicates that one entity was formed or unified as a result of merging or combining multiple entities after a specified point in time.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efd6af156c81908f50c2cd7db0e1ef completed April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f71422adac8190a5ceb32dcf820833 completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f712764d2c819081b64b27e5de4a13 completed May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f71421e8d08190807ccfb15d0f0ddb completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:53 p.m.