Triple

T28133880
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Forth defences E714143 entity
Predicate geographicFeatureDefended P170988 FINISHED
Object Firth of Forth estuary NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Firth of Forth estuary | Statement: [Forth defences, geographicFeatureDefended, Firth of Forth estuary]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: geographicFeatureDefended
Context triple: [Forth defences, geographicFeatureDefended, Firth of Forth estuary]
  • A. fortressDefended
    Indicates that a fortress is actively protected against threats or attacks by some defending force.
  • B. fortificationTypeDefended
    Indicates the specific type of fortification that an entity is responsible for defending or protecting.
  • C. isFortificationGatewayOf
    Indicates that a gateway or entrance structure serves as an access point or defensive portal belonging to a specific fortification.
  • D. riverDefended
    Indicates that a river is actively protected or guarded against threats, such as environmental damage, encroachment, or hostile actions.
  • E. townDefendedBy
    Indicates that a particular town is protected or guarded by a specified defending force or entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69efd6af156c81908f50c2cd7db0e1ef completed April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6984bb55c8190862eb8796868d188 completed May 3, 2026, 12:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69661e6ec8190948251c7516a32ad completed May 3, 2026, 12:27 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6978ec27c8190a488e1f9c2566d38 completed May 3, 2026, 12:32 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:48 p.m.