Triple
T28100009
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Congrès de Tours de 1920 |
E710204
|
entity |
| Predicate | décisionMinoritaire |
P76466
|
FINISHED |
| Object | maintien dans la IIe Internationale |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: maintien dans la IIe Internationale | Statement: [Congrès de Tours de 1920, décisionMinoritaire, maintien dans la IIe Internationale]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: décisionMinoritaire Context triple: [Congrès de Tours de 1920, décisionMinoritaire, maintien dans la IIe Internationale]
-
A.
dissentingJustice
Indicates that a particular justice disagrees with the majority opinion or decision in a legal case.
-
B.
voteMinority
chosen
Indicates that an entity cast a vote that was not part of the majority decision or outcome.
-
C.
majorityOpinion
Indicates that a particular opinion is held by more than half of the relevant group or decision-making body.
-
D.
unanimousDecision
Indicates that all relevant participants fully agree on a decision without any dissent.
-
E.
decidedIn
Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b70fd108190a875953b2e50ca91 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f643ed0b7481908cf25f3afec0a61d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641def1e88190a05bf865ced78b23 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 9:04 p.m.