Triple
T28078601
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Upper Basin |
E709614
|
entity |
| Predicate | waterUseDominatedBy |
P178027
|
FINISHED |
| Object | agriculture |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: agriculture | Statement: [Upper Basin, waterUseDominatedBy, agriculture]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: waterUseDominatedBy Context triple: [Upper Basin, waterUseDominatedBy, agriculture]
-
A.
waterUse
Indicates the amount or manner in which water is consumed, utilized, or withdrawn by an entity or activity.
-
B.
hasWaterUse
Indicates a relationship where one entity utilizes or consumes water for a particular purpose, process, or function.
-
C.
waterUseAffects
Indicates that one entity’s use of water has an impact or influence on another entity or condition.
-
D.
waterSupplyShare
Indicates the proportion of a total water supply that is allocated to or used by a particular entity.
-
E.
waterManagementDependence
Indicates that one entity’s ability to manage water resources (such as supply, quality, or distribution) relies on or is significantly influenced by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b7037f0819095bb90eaccbcaf32 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f707f7959881908f037f0d6b1d0c36 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f700fc274c8190a128593dc7c7abd0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:02 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f707f380388190954b79d52a321921 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:50 p.m.