Triple
T2806765
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Puy de Sancy |
E54070
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSummitFacilities |
P27847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | viewing platform |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: viewing platform | Statement: [Puy de Sancy, hasSummitFacilities, viewing platform]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSummitFacilities Context triple: [Puy de Sancy, hasSummitFacilities, viewing platform]
-
A.
hasSummitFacility
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or provides a facility or infrastructure located at the summit of another entity (such as a mountain, hill, or peak).
-
B.
hasSummitFeature
Indicates that a summit (or peak) possesses a particular characteristic, attribute, or notable feature.
-
C.
hasSummit
Indicates that one entity possesses, features, or includes a summit or highest point as part of its structure or characteristics.
-
D.
hasSummitTrail
Indicates that there exists a trail or route leading to the summit or highest point of a geographic feature.
-
E.
hasSummitConditions
Indicates that specific environmental or situational conditions required for a summit (e.g., peak ascent or high-level meeting) are present or satisfied.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab49dcee188190b5c6eca9ae9e3469 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abde2ec2ac8190bd702ad3eafb6aed |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd059f308190853191f6ffe2bc6f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:59 p.m.