Triple
T28060969
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Patience |
E709105
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOfMusicProject |
P91530
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tame Impala |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tame Impala | Statement: [Patience, partOfMusicProject, Tame Impala]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partOfMusicProject Context triple: [Patience, partOfMusicProject, Tame Impala]
-
A.
musicalProject
chosen
Indicates that an entity is a musical endeavor or body of work, such as a band, solo act, or organized music-making project, associated with another entity.
-
B.
partOfMusical
Indicates that something is a component, segment, or element belonging to a larger musical work or performance.
-
C.
partOfComposerOeuvre
Indicates that a musical work belongs to and is included within the overall body of compositions created by a particular composer.
-
D.
musicContribution
Indicates that an entity has contributed in some way to the creation, performance, or production of a musical work.
-
E.
musicalWork
Indicates a relationship where an entity is identified as a musical composition or piece associated with another entity (such as a creator, performance, or recording).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6eb6d88190a3fea236eb0f7bed |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fdb45537288190b6791078d4a6899f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fdb39ad96481908376d7def9fafc13 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m.