Triple
T28054554
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California |
E708925
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | interstate water apportionment decision |
C17346
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: interstate water apportionment decision Context triple: [Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California, instanceOf, interstate water apportionment decision]
-
A.
water resources development act
The Water Resources Development Act is a recurring United States federal law that authorizes and guides the planning, construction, and maintenance of water resources projects such as navigation, flood control, and ecosystem restoration, primarily carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
-
B.
water management policy decision
chosen
A water management policy decision is a deliberate choice by authorities or stakeholders that sets rules, priorities, and actions for allocating, conserving, and protecting water resources to balance environmental, social, and economic needs.
-
C.
water resources management agreement
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
D.
interstate boundary river
An interstate boundary river is a natural watercourse whose channel or thalweg forms all or part of the legal border between two or more states or equivalent political jurisdictions.
-
E.
transboundary river system
A transboundary river system is a network of rivers and related water bodies that cross or form political borders between two or more countries, requiring shared management and governance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6df9f48190bbb971d02cbe1b65 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:35 p.m.