Triple

T28054147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Get It Together (Reprise) E708913 entity
Predicate hasReworkedArrangementOf P167089 FINISHED
Object Get It Together NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Get It Together | Statement: [Get It Together (Reprise), hasReworkedArrangementOf, Get It Together]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReworkedArrangementOf
Context triple: [Get It Together (Reprise), hasReworkedArrangementOf, Get It Together]
  • A. hasAlternativeArrangementsFor
    Indicates that one entity provides or specifies substitute or backup arrangements that can be used in place of another entity’s primary arrangements.
  • B. hasMusicalArrangementCharacteristic
    Indicates that a musical arrangement possesses a specific characteristic, feature, or quality.
  • C. hasMultipleArrangements
    Indicates that an entity can exist or be configured in more than one distinct arrangement or setup.
  • D. hasAlternativeArrangement
    Indicates that one entity can be organized, configured, or structured in a different valid way as an alternative to its current or primary arrangement.
  • E. musicalArrangement chosen
    Indicates that one entity is an arrangement or adaptation of another musical work.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef9b6df9f48190bbb971d02cbe1b65 completed April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff27b125948190aced0fe0189fd39a completed May 9, 2026, 12:25 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff26c30a0481909ef6a54ded851e42 completed May 9, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:35 p.m.