Triple
T28048104
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Christopher Boyce |
E708738
|
entity |
| Predicate | rearrestedIn |
P14103
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1981 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1981 | Statement: [Christopher Boyce, rearrestedIn, 1981]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: rearrestedIn Context triple: [Christopher Boyce, rearrestedIn, 1981]
-
A.
reArrested
chosen
Indicates that an entity is arrested again after having been previously released or arrested before.
-
B.
arrestedFor
Indicates that an authority has taken someone into custody because they are suspected or accused of committing a specified offense or wrongdoing.
-
C.
arrestedWith
Indicates that two or more individuals were arrested at the same time and in connection with the same incident or operation.
-
D.
wasArrestedAfter
Indicates that one entity was arrested at a point in time later than another specified event or arrest.
-
E.
wasArrested
Indicates that an authority detained and took a person into legal custody in connection with a suspected offense.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6df9f48190bbb971d02cbe1b65 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63f3559148190bca6f6c3e45d3961 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63710d17c819084cfe96e6df334fd |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:31 p.m.