Triple
T28034023
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Spätburgunder |
E708351
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTypicalWineStyle |
P2082
|
FINISHED |
| Object | oak-aged red wine |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: oak-aged red wine | Statement: [Spätburgunder, hasTypicalWineStyle, oak-aged red wine]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypicalWineStyle Context triple: [Spätburgunder, hasTypicalWineStyle, oak-aged red wine]
-
A.
usesWineType
Indicates that one entity makes use of, incorporates, or is associated with a particular type or category of wine.
-
B.
wineStyle
chosen
Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
-
C.
wineStyleContribution
Indicates how much a given factor or component influences or shapes the overall style or character of a wine.
-
D.
regulatesWineType
Indicates that one entity has authority or influence over the rules, standards, or conditions governing a particular type of wine.
-
E.
wineStylesAssociatedWith
Indicates a relationship where certain wine styles are linked or connected to a particular entity, such as a region, grape, producer, or product.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6bdd9c8190bb3a574a03774ad1 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcda3699948190adb57625bae08091 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcd8fd16d08190b0aca6e19a632e99 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 6:25 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:19 p.m.