Triple

T28028902
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tissues and Issues E708205 entity
Predicate stylisticallyConnectedTo P86170 FINISHED
Object Prelude NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Prelude | Statement: [Tissues and Issues, stylisticallyConnectedTo, Prelude]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: stylisticallyConnectedTo
Context triple: [Tissues and Issues, stylisticallyConnectedTo, Prelude]
  • A. hasMusicalStyleSimilarTo chosen
    Indicates that two entities share a comparable or closely related musical style or sound.
  • B. musicalArtistAssociated
    Indicates a relationship where one musical artist is professionally connected or affiliated with another, such as through collaboration, membership, or frequent association.
  • C. musicalCollaborator
    Indicates a relationship where two or more entities work together in creating, performing, or producing music.
  • D. referencedByArtist
    Indicates that an artist has mentioned, cited, or otherwise referred to the target entity in their work or related materials.
  • E. notableAssociatedArtist
    Indicates that there is a significant or noteworthy association between an artist and another entity, such as a work, organization, or place.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef9b6bdd9c8190bb3a574a03774ad1 completed April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f63fd79e4c8190af9263b679e5ff07 completed May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f63c6a8474819091b8c6fe98e3862d completed May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:14 p.m.