Triple
T28024316
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Walk It Talk It |
E707769
|
entity |
| Predicate | popularizedPhrase |
P46151
|
FINISHED |
| Object | walk it like I talk it |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: walk it like I talk it | Statement: [Walk It Talk It, popularizedPhrase, walk it like I talk it]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: popularizedPhrase Context triple: [Walk It Talk It, popularizedPhrase, walk it like I talk it]
-
A.
typicalPhrase
Indicates that the object is a phrase commonly or characteristically used in connection with the subject.
-
B.
becameCatchphraseIn
Indicates that a phrase or expression came to be widely recognized and used as a catchphrase within a particular context, group, or time period.
-
C.
usedPhrase
Indicates that one entity employed or expressed a particular phrase in speech, writing, or another form of communication.
-
D.
popularizedBy
Indicates that something became widely known, accepted, or fashionable as a result of the influence or actions of a particular agent.
-
E.
popularizedByLyric
chosen
Indicates that something became widely known or gained popularity as a result of being mentioned or featured in a song’s lyrics.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96baf3a881909a2b63844185dddd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f70e8755a48190931eaa77946f9460 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:59 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f70abc00848190a1c3f495ef6c8dc6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:43 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:12 p.m.