Triple
T28015315
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Flora of Canada |
E707530
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesTaxonomicGroup |
P45064
|
FINISHED |
| Object | conifers |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: conifers | Statement: [Flora of Canada, includesTaxonomicGroup, conifers]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesTaxonomicGroup Context triple: [Flora of Canada, includesTaxonomicGroup, conifers]
-
A.
includesTaxaWith
chosen
Indicates that an entity contains or encompasses one or more specified taxa within its scope or membership.
-
B.
includesExampleTaxon
Indicates that a taxonomic group or concept contains a specific taxon used as an illustrative or representative example.
-
C.
taxonGroup
Indicates a classification relationship where one taxon is grouped within or associated with a broader taxonomic group.
-
D.
hasImportantTaxonGroup
Indicates that an entity is associated with a taxonomic group considered particularly significant or relevant in a given biological or classification context.
-
E.
includesParasiticTaxa
Indicates that the referenced group or set contains taxa that live parasitically on or within other organisms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96baf3a881909a2b63844185dddd |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fea1f5d8c481908dc3351dc9ecef7f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:54 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea06b6fe0819095bf4c1bc9809927 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:06 p.m.