Triple
T28001293
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | What Are Poets For? |
E707154
|
entity |
| Predicate | viewOnPoets |
P77792
|
FINISHED |
| Object | poets are guardians of language |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: poets are guardians of language | Statement: [What Are Poets For?, viewOnPoets, poets are guardians of language]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: viewOnPoets Context triple: [What Are Poets For?, viewOnPoets, poets are guardians of language]
-
A.
viewsPoetryAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity regards or interprets poetry in a particular way or from a specific perspective.
-
B.
favoritePoet
Indicates that one entity is the poet whom another entity prefers above all other poets.
-
C.
featuredPoet
Indicates that a person is highlighted or showcased as a poet in a special or prominent context.
-
D.
includesPoetsFrom
Indicates that one entity contains, features, or is composed of poets originating from another entity.
-
E.
devotionalPoets
Indicates a relationship in which poets are characterized by or associated with devotional (religious or spiritual) themes in their work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b980d88190a753b2f9a978595a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6f8565134819096aac0175f924a9f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6f65fd1d08190b88e5e68ba268500 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:16 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:57 p.m.