Triple

T27999504
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Inductions of Ethics E707109 entity
Predicate developsArgumentAgainst P153879 FINISHED
Object hedonistic utilitarianism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: hedonistic utilitarianism | Statement: [The Inductions of Ethics, developsArgumentAgainst, hedonistic utilitarianism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developsArgumentAgainst
Context triple: [The Inductions of Ethics, developsArgumentAgainst, hedonistic utilitarianism]
  • A. usedInArgumentAgainst
    Indicates that something (such as a statement, example, or piece of evidence) is employed as support within an argument opposing or criticizing a particular claim, position, or entity.
  • B. arguesThat
    Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
  • C. arguesFrom
    Indicates that one entity presents reasoning, evidence, or justification starting from another entity (such as a premise, assumption, or position) to support a conclusion or claim.
  • D. defenseArgument
    Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
  • E. aimsToRefute chosen
    Indicates an intention or effort by one entity to disprove, counter, or invalidate a claim, argument, or position held by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef96b980d88190a753b2f9a978595a completed April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6b903538481909cffcb6cc1cc0e70 completed May 3, 2026, 2:54 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6b626120c819097c9ad04487570d7 completed May 3, 2026, 2:42 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:56 p.m.