Triple
T27999502
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Inductions of Ethics |
E707109
|
entity |
| Predicate | developsArgumentFor |
P2397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | objective moral values |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: objective moral values | Statement: [The Inductions of Ethics, developsArgumentFor, objective moral values]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: developsArgumentFor Context triple: [The Inductions of Ethics, developsArgumentFor, objective moral values]
-
A.
arguesThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
B.
arguesFrom
Indicates that one entity presents reasoning, evidence, or justification starting from another entity (such as a premise, assumption, or position) to support a conclusion or claim.
-
C.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
D.
defenseArgument
Indicates that an entity presents or supports a line of reasoning intended to defend or justify another entity, often in a legal or argumentative context.
-
E.
usedInArgumentAgainst
Indicates that something (such as a statement, example, or piece of evidence) is employed as support within an argument opposing or criticizing a particular claim, position, or entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b980d88190a753b2f9a978595a |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6b49436b0819094e21603054d05d4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6b3a5fd8481909433e923c5e24e55 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:32 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:56 p.m.