Triple

T27988329
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Les Amants E706803 entity
Predicate ageRatingControversy P163605 FINISHED
Object obscenity accusations in the U.S. LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: obscenity accusations in the U.S. | Statement: [Les Amants, ageRatingControversy, obscenity accusations in the U.S.]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ageRatingControversy
Context triple: [Les Amants, ageRatingControversy, obscenity accusations in the U.S.]
  • A. ageRatingContext
    Indicates the contextual basis or circumstances (such as region, system, or criteria) under which an age rating is assigned or interpreted.
  • B. ratedFor
    Indicates that an entity has been evaluated and assigned a suitability or quality level for a particular purpose, context, or audience.
  • C. hasContentRating
    Indicates that something is associated with a specified content rating that reflects its suitability for particular audiences.
  • D. ageRatingSystem
    Indicates the classification scheme or standard used to assign age-appropriateness ratings to content.
  • E. USRating
    Indicates that an entity has been assigned a rating, classification, or evaluation according to a United States–based standard or system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef96b8b8d88190bad5e4ae966bf14e completed April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f63b6f14508190afdf5fc4aa04e855 completed May 2, 2026, 5:59 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f63710d17c819084cfe96e6df334fd completed May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f63893cc188190883ac9321a95d2dc completed May 2, 2026, 5:46 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:48 p.m.