Triple
T27988314
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Les Amants |
E706803
|
entity |
| Predicate | censorshipCase |
P138544
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jacobellis v. Ohio |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jacobellis v. Ohio | Statement: [Les Amants, censorshipCase, Jacobellis v. Ohio]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: censorshipCase Context triple: [Les Amants, censorshipCase, Jacobellis v. Ohio]
-
A.
censorshipEvent
Indicates an event in which information, expression, or communication is suppressed, restricted, or altered by some controlling authority or mechanism.
-
B.
censorshipIssues
Indicates that one entity imposes restrictions, suppression, or control over the information, expression, or content associated with another entity.
-
C.
censorshipTarget
chosen
Indicates that an entity is the object or focus of censorship by another entity or authority.
-
D.
typeOfCensorship
Indicates the specific kind or method of censorship being applied in a given context.
-
E.
censorshipLevel
Indicates the degree or strictness of control, suppression, or restriction applied to information, media, or expression.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b8b8d88190bad5e4ae966bf14e |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63fd79e4c8190af9263b679e5ff07 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c6a8474819091b8c6fe98e3862d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:48 p.m.