Triple
T2798181
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reg A |
E53087
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityTypePermitted |
P43251
|
FINISHED |
| Object | equity securities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: equity securities | Statement: [Reg A, securityTypePermitted, equity securities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityTypePermitted Context triple: [Reg A, securityTypePermitted, equity securities]
-
A.
securityType
Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
-
B.
permitType
Indicates the specific category or kind of permit associated with an entity or activity.
-
C.
securityRole
Indicates that an entity holds a specific security-related role, permission level, or access profile within a system or context.
-
D.
securityStatus
Indicates the current level or condition of protection, risk, or vulnerability associated with an entity or system.
-
E.
securityArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab495a90788190941b6917e1eca3a6 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abddf204148190a53f3f30d645d94c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd040f9481908e9c7a2df88ea1ae |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abddcc348081908b5f760899389d4f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:11 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:58 p.m.