Triple

T2797260
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Gregg v. Georgia E53067 entity
Predicate introducedDoctrine P27707 FINISHED
Object guided discretion in capital sentencing LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: guided discretion in capital sentencing | Statement: [Gregg v. Georgia, introducedDoctrine, guided discretion in capital sentencing]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: introducedDoctrine
Context triple: [Gregg v. Georgia, introducedDoctrine, guided discretion in capital sentencing]
  • A. developedDoctrine chosen
    Indicates that one entity created, formulated, or significantly advanced a particular doctrine or set of principles.
  • B. proposesDoctrine
    Indicates that one entity formally puts forward or advocates a particular doctrine, theory, or set of principles for consideration or adoption by others.
  • C. confirmedDoctrine
    Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
  • D. appliedDoctrine
    Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or rule has been put into practice or used in interpreting or deciding a specific case, situation, or context.
  • E. keyDoctrine
    Indicates that something is a central or foundational doctrine within a belief system, organization, or theoretical framework.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab495a90788190941b6917e1eca3a6 completed March 6, 2026, 9:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abddf0f4988190bffc3abab7edbb81 completed March 7, 2026, 8:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abdd040f9481908e9c7a2df88ea1ae completed March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:58 p.m.