Triple

T27956086
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yongding Hakka E703552 entity
Predicate hasDialectalOriginOf P187371 FINISHED
Object Taiwanese Hakka speech NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Taiwanese Hakka speech | Statement: [Yongding Hakka, hasDialectalOriginOf, Taiwanese Hakka speech]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDialectalOriginOf
Context triple: [Yongding Hakka, hasDialectalOriginOf, Taiwanese Hakka speech]
  • A. hasDialectalCounterpart
    Indicates that one linguistic form has a corresponding equivalent or variant in another dialect.
  • B. hasDialectalDifferenceWith
    Indicates that two language varieties differ from each other in dialectal features such as pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar.
  • C. hasDialectContinuumWith
    Indicates that two languages or dialects are part of a continuous chain of mutually intelligible varieties, without a clear boundary separating them.
  • D. hasLanguageOfOrigin
    Indicates that one entity has its origin or source in the language specified by another entity.
  • E. hasDialectalFeaturesSharedWith
    Indicates that two language varieties share specific dialectal features or characteristics in common.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef840c8b2c8190946ae9522774ba51 completed April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fb563a28d88190b28345c465c545f8 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:28 p.m.