Triple
T27952880
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 45°, 90°, 180° |
E703475
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAngleReference |
P174264
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 45° |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 45° | Statement: [45°, 90°, 180°, hasAngleReference, 45°]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAngleReference Context triple: [45°, 90°, 180°, hasAngleReference, 45°]
-
A.
hasTypicalAngle
Indicates that there is a characteristic or commonly occurring angle associated with the relationship between the entities.
-
B.
supportsAngleModes
Indicates that one entity provides functionality for handling or operating in multiple angle measurement modes (such as degrees, radians, or gradians) for another entity or context.
-
C.
hasTriangleAngle
Indicates that a triangle possesses a specific angle as one of its interior angles.
-
D.
hasHueAngle
Indicates that one entity has a specific hue angle value in a color space, describing its position on the color wheel.
-
E.
usesIrrationalAngle
Indicates that the relationship or action involves an angle whose measure is an irrational number (i.e., cannot be expressed as a ratio of integers).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef840c8b2c8190946ae9522774ba51 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6bcc425588190afd0dceba43ed79f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6ba6b1e6c8190adf9d6a257e0b744 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6bbf5a8288190ae170bcbe8ab65cf |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:07 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:26 p.m.