Triple
T27947088
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dar Ta‘arud al-‘Aql wa al-Naql |
E700909
|
entity |
| Predicate | epistemicHierarchy |
P31335
|
FINISHED |
| Object | places revelation above speculative reason while affirming harmony with sound reason |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: places revelation above speculative reason while affirming harmony with sound reason | Statement: [Dar Ta‘arud al-‘Aql wa al-Naql, epistemicHierarchy, places revelation above speculative reason while affirming harmony with sound reason]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: epistemicHierarchy Context triple: [Dar Ta‘arud al-‘Aql wa al-Naql, epistemicHierarchy, places revelation above speculative reason while affirming harmony with sound reason]
-
A.
epistemicPriority
chosen
Indicates that one piece of information, belief, or source is treated as more authoritative or reliable than another in determining what is accepted as true.
-
B.
epistemicBasis
Indicates the justificatory relationship by which one piece of information, belief, or evidence serves as the basis for holding another belief or knowledge claim.
-
C.
epistemicPosition
Indicates the stance, degree of certainty, or type of knowledge an agent holds regarding a particular proposition or claim.
-
D.
epistemicStatus
Indicates the degree of certainty, justification, or knowledge an agent has regarding a particular proposition or claim.
-
E.
typeOfEpistemology
Indicates that one epistemological position, theory, or approach is classified as a specific kind or category within the broader domain of epistemology.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a5028108190a14696d9821dde49 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63b317e048190963989b732b25b91 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6370ea79c81909b761821ee0fa698 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:22 p.m.