Triple

T27937105
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject R.K. Maroon E700642 entity
Predicate alignmentWithToons P163796 FINISHED
Object exploitative LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exploitative | Statement: [R.K. Maroon, alignmentWithToons, exploitative]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alignmentWithToons
Context triple: [R.K. Maroon, alignmentWithToons, exploitative]
  • A. alignmentComponents
    Indicates that one entity is composed of or associated with specific subparts or elements that together form its overall alignment.
  • B. alignmentWithProtagonist
    Indicates the degree to which an entity’s goals, actions, or loyalties are supportive of, neutral toward, or opposed to the protagonist.
  • C. alignmentShape
    Indicates that one entity’s shape is arranged, oriented, or matched in position relative to another entity’s shape.
  • D. alignmentWithMac
    Indicates that something is compatible or properly configured to work with a Mac operating system or environment.
  • E. alignmentInSeries
    Indicates that one entity’s position or orientation is arranged in a specific way relative to others within an ordered sequence or series.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a5028108190a14696d9821dde49 completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f63c045bd081908e0cb2a119202e8f completed May 2, 2026, 6:01 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6370ea79c81909b761821ee0fa698 completed May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f63b3039808190b00bbd19161487f3 completed May 2, 2026, 5:58 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 7:14 p.m.