Triple
T27925616
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Adidas Finale Paris |
E707823
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableMatchTeams |
P69211
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FC Barcelona |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: FC Barcelona | Statement: [Adidas Finale Paris, notableMatchTeams, FC Barcelona]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableMatchTeams Context triple: [Adidas Finale Paris, notableMatchTeams, FC Barcelona]
-
A.
notableMatch
Indicates that there exists a particularly significant or noteworthy match or pairing between the related entities.
-
B.
notableTeams
chosen
Indicates that there is a noteworthy association between an entity and one or more teams with which it is significantly connected or recognized.
-
C.
notablePlayerTeam1
Indicates that the referenced player is a notable or prominent member of the first team in a given context or matchup.
-
D.
notableRivalTeam
Indicates that one team is recognized as a significant or well-known rival of another team.
-
E.
notablePlayerTeam2
Indicates that the second team in a context has a player who is particularly notable or distinguished.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96bbf2c48190a9d0e0291457aab6 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00532815c881908f10d9594458b3d7 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 9:43 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0052b9f030819081b8105bdcaf6d8f |
completed | May 10, 2026, 9:41 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:59 p.m.