Triple
T2792170
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | gold dollar |
E61954
|
entity |
| Predicate | lastYearOfMinting |
P43627
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1889 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1889 | Statement: [gold dollar, lastYearOfMinting, 1889]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lastYearOfMinting Context triple: [gold dollar, lastYearOfMinting, 1889]
-
A.
firstYearOfMintage
Indicates the year in which a coin or similar item was first officially produced or issued.
-
B.
mintedAt
Indicates the specific time or block at which a digital asset or token was created (minted) on a blockchain.
-
C.
firstMintingPeriodStart
Indicates the point in time when the initial minting period for a given asset or token begins.
-
D.
coinsProduced
Indicates that a particular entity (such as a mint or authority) has produced or issued a specified set or quantity of coins.
-
E.
firstRedenominationYear
Indicates the year in which a currency or financial unit was first redenominated (i.e., its face value was officially recalibrated or replaced).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4b7f51d881908768300ebd2fbdae |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdeea881481908d759c72798a50fb |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd025c948190a97dd961a9592bac |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abdee94c2081908e5075e87e70780a |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:16 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:58 p.m.