Triple

T27912075
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Battle of Tinemore E705955 entity
Predicate hasUncertainHistoricalStatus P33842 FINISHED
Object possibly apocryphal LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: possibly apocryphal | Statement: [Battle of Tinemore, hasUncertainHistoricalStatus, possibly apocryphal]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasUncertainHistoricalStatus
Context triple: [Battle of Tinemore, hasUncertainHistoricalStatus, possibly apocryphal]
  • A. hasUncertainHistoricBasis chosen
    Indicates that the historical foundation or authenticity of the related fact, event, or relationship is doubtful, disputed, or not firmly established.
  • B. hasUncertainOrigin
    Indicates that the origin or source of an entity, event, or information is unknown, unclear, or not reliably established.
  • C. historicalStatusOf
    Indicates the historical condition, role, or classification that an entity held during a specific past period or context.
  • D. hasUncertainBiographicalDetails
    Indicates that the biographical information about an entity is incomplete, ambiguous, or not reliably established.
  • E. historiographicalStatus
    Indicates the recognized standing or classification of something within historical writing or scholarship, such as how it is interpreted, debated, or valued by historians.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef96b5aad08190be36a277c31e7004 completed April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a28c7c148190bfc980aad9f678ca completed May 3, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69fe1e3c88190830bb2e9f407357e completed May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:50 p.m.