Triple
T27909864
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | George S. Boutwell |
E705894
|
entity |
| Predicate | wasManagerIn |
P70411
|
FINISHED |
| Object | impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson | Statement: [George S. Boutwell, wasManagerIn, impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: wasManagerIn Context triple: [George S. Boutwell, wasManagerIn, impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson]
-
A.
activeAsManagerDuring
chosen
Indicates that an entity holds and performs the role of manager for another entity throughout a specified time period.
-
B.
activeAsManager
Indicates that an entity currently holds and performs the role or responsibilities of a manager in relation to another entity.
-
C.
wasIn
Indicates that an entity existed, occurred, or was located within a particular place or context during a specified time or situation.
-
D.
hasManagement
Indicates that one entity exercises managerial authority or oversight over another entity.
-
E.
wereInternedBy
Indicates that an entity was forcibly confined, detained, or held in an internment facility by another entity (typically an authority or government).
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b5aad08190be36a277c31e7004 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63b317e048190963989b732b25b91 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6370ea79c81909b761821ee0fa698 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:49 p.m.