Triple

T27904030
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject III Corps (Union Army) E705718 entity
Predicate notableCommanderWoundedAtGettysburg P202079 FINISHED
Object Daniel E. Sickles NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Daniel E. Sickles | Statement: [III Corps (Union Army), notableCommanderWoundedAtGettysburg, Daniel E. Sickles]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableCommanderWoundedAtGettysburg
Context triple: [III Corps (Union Army), notableCommanderWoundedAtGettysburg, Daniel E. Sickles]
  • A. corpsCommanderAtGettysburg
    Indicates that the subject served as a corps commander during the Battle of Gettysburg.
  • B. commanderAtGettysburg
    Indicates that the subject served as a military commander at the Battle of Gettysburg.
  • C. armyCommanderAtGettysburg
    Indicates that the person served as an army commander during the Battle of Gettysburg.
  • D. brigadeCommanderAtGettysburg
    Indicates that the subject served as a brigade commander during the Battle of Gettysburg.
  • E. higherCommanderAtGettysburg
    Indicates that one entity served as the superior military commander of another entity during the Battle of Gettysburg.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef96b5aad08190be36a277c31e7004 completed April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a004d0b46148190bcec4ea67acfe170 completed May 10, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a004c92283081909f229c1720af155a completed May 10, 2026, 9:14 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a004d0a95548190ac822cd1d54edf42 completed May 10, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:44 p.m.