Triple
T27885607
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Reversi |
E705213
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSkillEmphasis |
P45342
|
FINISHED |
| Object | tactical play |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: tactical play | Statement: [Reversi, hasSkillEmphasis, tactical play]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSkillEmphasis Context triple: [Reversi, hasSkillEmphasis, tactical play]
-
A.
skillEmphasis
chosen
Indicates that a particular skill is given special focus, priority, or importance within a context such as a role, task, or curriculum.
-
B.
emphasizesAbility
Indicates that one entity highlights, stresses, or draws special attention to the capability or skill of another entity.
-
C.
indicatesSkill
Indicates a relationship where one entity possesses, demonstrates, or is associated with a particular skill represented by another entity.
-
D.
skilledIn
Indicates that an entity possesses ability, expertise, or proficiency in performing or using another entity (such as a task, tool, or domain).
-
E.
hasEmphasis
Indicates that one element is given special stress, importance, or prominence relative to others.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef96b39c448190a9b3aa6672a5168f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f639b09d208190a78de29906514a12 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:51 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6318be69481909d1bcf29b7b60eb2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:32 p.m.