Triple

T27880053
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Australia's Next Top Model E705061 entity
Predicate contestantEligibility P84 FINISHED
Object aspiring female models LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: aspiring female models | Statement: [Australia's Next Top Model, contestantEligibility, aspiring female models]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: contestantEligibility
Context triple: [Australia's Next Top Model, contestantEligibility, aspiring female models]
  • A. typicalPlayerEligibility
    Indicates that an entity meets the usual or standard conditions required to be eligible to participate as a player in a given context.
  • B. controlsPlayerEligibility
    Indicates a relationship where one entity determines or regulates whether a player is allowed to participate.
  • C. eligibilityLevel
    Indicates the degree or tier of qualification an entity has for a given benefit, service, or status.
  • D. eligibility chosen
    Indicates that an entity meets the required conditions or qualifications to participate in, receive, or perform something.
  • E. playerEligibilityBasis
    Indicates the basis or criteria used to determine a player's eligibility for participation.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef84111bb4819084298f994b31c62f completed April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f69edbb7648190bd89c57e0932eac1 completed May 3, 2026, 1:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69d17e8d48190b30bcc2f4bd81eb2 completed May 3, 2026, 12:55 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:29 p.m.