Triple
T27876789
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | DJ Twinz |
E704961
|
entity |
| Predicate | workQuality |
P163248
|
FINISHED |
| Object | top-tier |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: top-tier | Statement: [DJ Twinz, workQuality, top-tier]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workQuality Context triple: [DJ Twinz, workQuality, top-tier]
-
A.
workWith
Indicates that one entity collaborates or engages in work-related activities together with another entity.
-
B.
workOn
Indicates that an agent is actively engaged in performing tasks or making progress on a particular project, object, or assignment.
-
C.
workWithin
Indicates that one entity performs its activities or duties inside the boundaries, scope, or context defined by another entity.
-
D.
work focus
Indicates that an entity’s primary professional attention, effort, or activity is concentrated on a particular subject, task, or area.
-
E.
workOpus
Indicates that an entity is the creator or author of a particular work or opus.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef84111bb4819084298f994b31c62f |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6398047e081908137e619416f3e80 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6318be69481909d1bcf29b7b60eb2 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:17 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6352df6148190bc10772cd40bd7b3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:27 p.m.