Triple
T27858078
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Coroners and Justice Act 2009 |
E704139
|
entity |
| Predicate | amendedAreaOfLaw |
P128135
|
FINISHED |
| Object | law of homicide in England and Wales |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: law of homicide in England and Wales | Statement: [Coroners and Justice Act 2009, amendedAreaOfLaw, law of homicide in England and Wales]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: amendedAreaOfLaw Context triple: [Coroners and Justice Act 2009, amendedAreaOfLaw, law of homicide in England and Wales]
-
A.
legalAmendment
Indicates a formal change or modification made to an existing law, regulation, or legal document.
-
B.
amendedFor
Indicates that one entity has been modified or revised specifically to address, correct, or accommodate another entity.
-
C.
legalReformer
Indicates that an entity works to change, improve, or modernize laws or legal systems.
-
D.
amendmentSubject
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the subject or content that is being modified, revised, or updated by an amendment applied to another entity.
-
E.
governingDocumentToAmend
Indicates that one document serves as the governing document that is subject to amendment by another specified action or instrument.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef840e614c8190a88cf9638c14a265 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6390ab0dc8190b77eca37e9e7f2d4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:48 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6318ae6f08190b3f85f9201046a15 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:15 p.m.