Triple
T27857862
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 |
E704134
|
entity |
| Predicate | laterLegislationInteracting |
P154355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Access to Justice Act 1999 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Access to Justice Act 1999 | Statement: [Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, laterLegislationInteracting, Access to Justice Act 1999]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterLegislationInteracting Context triple: [Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, laterLegislationInteracting, Access to Justice Act 1999]
-
A.
subsequentLegislation
chosen
Indicates that one piece of legislation follows and is enacted after another, often affecting or modifying the earlier law.
-
B.
relatedLegislation
Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
-
C.
legislatureAffected
Indicates that an action, event, or measure has an impact on a legislative body or its functioning.
-
D.
areaOfLegislation
Indicates that one entity defines, concerns, or governs the legal domain or subject matter covered by another entity.
-
E.
significantLegislation
Indicates that a piece of legislation has substantial importance or impact within a legal, political, or social context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef840e614c8190a88cf9638c14a265 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd2cf39b0c8190811b8a6fa9410560 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd2ad8dd988190a9899701ba00d917 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 12:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:15 p.m.