Triple
T27852544
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Division of McEwen |
E703994
|
entity |
| Predicate | JohnMcEwenParty |
P163738
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Country Party |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Country Party | Statement: [Division of McEwen, JohnMcEwenParty, Country Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: JohnMcEwenParty Context triple: [Division of McEwen, JohnMcEwenParty, Country Party]
-
A.
JonathanDjanoglyParty
Indicates the political party with which Jonathan Djanogly is affiliated.
-
B.
MarkFletcherParty
Indicates that Mark Fletcher is affiliated with or a member of a particular political party.
-
C.
otherParliamentaryParty
Indicates that two political entities are distinct parliamentary parties within the same parliamentary context or system.
-
D.
otherMajorParty
Indicates that an entity is affiliated with a major political party other than a specified primary or reference party.
-
E.
majorPartyInLosingCoalition
Indicates that a major political party is a member of a coalition that ultimately loses (e.g., an election, vote, or contest for power).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef840e614c8190a88cf9638c14a265 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63c045bd081908e0cb2a119202e8f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:01 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6370ea79c81909b761821ee0fa698 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f63b3039808190b00bbd19161487f3 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:11 p.m.