Triple

T27845949
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Greater Tunb E703819 entity
Predicate disputeCharacter P163414 FINISHED
Object longstanding territorial dispute LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: longstanding territorial dispute | Statement: [Greater Tunb, disputeCharacter, longstanding territorial dispute]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: disputeCharacter
Context triple: [Greater Tunb, disputeCharacter, longstanding territorial dispute]
  • A. dismissesCharacter
    Indicates that one character rejects, disbelieves, or disregards another character, often minimizing their importance, ideas, or concerns.
  • B. character1
    Indicates that the subject is identified as the first or primary character in a narrative or context.
  • C. character2
    Indicates that a second character entity is involved in the relationship or context defined by the predicate.
  • D. characterResolution
    Indicates the process or outcome by which a character’s conflicts, arcs, or internal struggles are brought to a conclusion or clarified within a narrative.
  • E. questionedCharacter
    Indicates that one entity directed questions or an interrogation toward another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef840d9e3c819093615ebff4ec22be completed April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f638da9bcc8190b6064afb5bcf17ec completed May 2, 2026, 5:48 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6318ae6f08190b3f85f9201046a15 completed May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6359d46b88190922dd7de508e3b0e completed May 2, 2026, 5:34 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:07 p.m.