Triple

T27845136
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Campania Ultra E703799 entity
Predicate historicalRegionWithin P105562 FINISHED
Object Campania NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Campania | Statement: [Campania Ultra, historicalRegionWithin, Campania]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalRegionWithin
Context triple: [Campania Ultra, historicalRegionWithin, Campania]
  • A. historicalRegionCorrespondsTo
    Indicates that a historical region matches or aligns with a specific region, territory, or administrative unit in terms of location, extent, or identity.
  • B. historicalRegion
    Indicates that an entity is or was a geographically defined area recognized for its significance during a particular historical period.
  • C. historicalRegionPartlyIn chosen
    Indicates that a historical region is located partly, but not entirely, within a specified larger area or territory.
  • D. historicalRegionCode
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific code identifying a historical region.
  • E. historicalFocusRegion
    Indicates that an entity’s primary historical attention, study, or activity is centered on a particular geographic region.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef840d9e3c819093615ebff4ec22be completed April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd8ccbd4c88190b13aae0673b3c821 completed May 8, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8ae2227c819089546f5c3629799e completed May 8, 2026, 7:04 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 6:06 p.m.