Triple
T27818273
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SNMP InformRequest |
E702741
|
entity |
| Predicate | securityEnhancedIn |
P2368
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SNMPv3 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SNMPv3 | Statement: [SNMP InformRequest, securityEnhancedIn, SNMPv3]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityEnhancedIn Context triple: [SNMP InformRequest, securityEnhancedIn, SNMPv3]
-
A.
securityGuarantee
Indicates a commitment by one party to protect or defend another party against specified threats or risks.
-
B.
securedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
-
C.
securityArrangementsBy
Indicates that one entity is responsible for providing, organizing, or overseeing security arrangements for another entity or situation.
-
D.
securityFeature
chosen
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
E.
securityArrangements
Indicates the existence, nature, or details of protective measures or safeguards established between or around entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef840ad1e88190b5bff2d1ddec8700 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6978fe97081908fe568091ad9b159 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f69661e6ec8190948251c7516a32ad |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:46 p.m.