Triple

T27817552
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Edwin Drood E702715 entity
Predicate hasAntagonisticRelationWith P18963 FINISHED
Object John Jasper NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Jasper | Statement: [Edwin Drood, hasAntagonisticRelationWith, John Jasper]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAntagonisticRelationWith
Context triple: [Edwin Drood, hasAntagonisticRelationWith, John Jasper]
  • A. antagonistOf chosen
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively opposes, conflicts with, or serves as an adversary to another.
  • B. hasFriendEnemyRelationshipWith
    Indicates a relationship where two entities are simultaneously connected as both friends and enemies, reflecting a mixed or ambivalent association between them.
  • C. antagonisticInteractionWith
    Indicates a hostile or oppositional interaction in which one entity acts against, harms, or obstructs another.
  • D. hasAntagonisticProtagonist
    Indicates that the work features a main character who opposes or undermines the typical heroic or moral expectations of a traditional protagonist.
  • E. relationshipWithAntagonist
    Indicates a relationship or connection that an entity has with an opposing or adversarial figure in a narrative or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef840ad1e88190b5bff2d1ddec8700 completed April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6afebd7ec8190ab696f363d84abf0 completed May 3, 2026, 2:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6aca204148190850a3dc325bc07b7 completed May 3, 2026, 2:02 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:46 p.m.