Triple

T27799919
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mount Haeckel E702210 entity
Predicate onBoundaryOf P67212 FINISHED
Object Inyo County, California NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Inyo County, California | Statement: [Mount Haeckel, onBoundaryOf, Inyo County, California]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: onBoundaryOf
Context triple: [Mount Haeckel, onBoundaryOf, Inyo County, California]
  • A. isBoundaryFor
    Indicates that one entity serves as the limiting edge, border, or enclosing extent that defines the spatial or conceptual bounds of another entity.
  • B. liesOnBorderOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is located along or directly adjacent to the boundary line separating it from another entity.
  • C. hasBoundaryIncludes
    Indicates that the spatial or conceptual boundary of one entity encompasses or contains the boundary of another entity.
  • D. hasBoundaryFeature
    Indicates that a boundary (such as an edge, border, or limit) of one entity is characterized, marked, or defined by a specific feature or element.
  • E. hasBoundaryCriterion
    Indicates that something is associated with a specific rule or condition used to define or limit its boundary.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef8408e0588190977cffa32dc33a29 completed April 27, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6380de8908190bbeb5fd0e5bb80ab completed May 2, 2026, 5:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6318ae6f08190b3f85f9201046a15 completed May 2, 2026, 5:16 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:33 p.m.