Triple
T27785499
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mrs Cheveley |
E700947
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPastConnectionWith |
P19343
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Lord Goring |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Lord Goring | Statement: [Mrs Cheveley, hasPastConnectionWith, Lord Goring]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPastConnectionWith Context triple: [Mrs Cheveley, hasPastConnectionWith, Lord Goring]
-
A.
formerlyConnectedTo
chosen
Indicates that two entities were once connected or associated in some way, but that connection no longer exists.
-
B.
hasTeleconnectionsWith
Indicates a relationship where changes or variations in one system, region, or variable are statistically linked to corresponding changes in another, often distant, system, region, or variable.
-
C.
historicalContactWith
Indicates that two entities have interacted or been in communication with each other at some point in the past.
-
D.
hasFormerParticipant
Indicates that an entity once participated in an activity, event, or organization but is no longer a current participant.
-
E.
hasConnectionPotential
Indicates that there exists a possibility or capacity for a meaningful connection or relationship to form between the entities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a50d8088190acbf3dfbb06d8091 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df |
completed | May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:24 p.m.