Triple
T27780712
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CCIP |
E699329
|
entity |
| Predicate | technologyTrack |
P163955
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Service Provider |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Service Provider | Statement: [CCIP, technologyTrack, Service Provider]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: technologyTrack Context triple: [CCIP, technologyTrack, Service Provider]
-
A.
technologyTrackExample
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as an example or instance of a particular technology track associated with another entity.
-
B.
technologyTrend
Indicates a relationship where a technology is characterized as part of a broader pattern of change or direction in technological development over time.
-
C.
technologyIncludes
Indicates that one technology encompasses, contains, or incorporates another technology as part of its components, features, or implementation.
-
D.
technologyPresent
Indicates that a particular technology exists, is available, or is currently in use in the given context or situation.
-
E.
technologyBasis
Indicates that one entity is founded on, enabled by, or fundamentally relies upon the technology provided or represented by another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a4b5a9081909c9111396c2be3d2 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6416fbf4081909b0913c337927fc4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f63c6895f0819088655277e45859a8 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:03 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f63fd4f7448190930c723ba7cfce62 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:17 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 5:09 p.m.