Triple

T27772460
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Phenomenon (remix) E701784 entity
Predicate vocalArrangementComparedToOriginal P165411 FINISHED
Object altered LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: altered | Statement: [Phenomenon (remix), vocalArrangementComparedToOriginal, altered]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: vocalArrangementComparedToOriginal
Context triple: [Phenomenon (remix), vocalArrangementComparedToOriginal, altered]
  • A. vocalArrangement
    Indicates the specific way vocal parts or voices are organized, structured, and combined within a musical work or performance.
  • B. usesOriginalVocalsFrom
    Indicates that one work incorporates the original, unaltered vocal recordings from another work.
  • C. isVocalVersionOf
    Indicates that one item is a version of another that includes vocal or sung elements, typically derived from an original instrumental or non-vocal form.
  • D. containsOriginalSongs
    Indicates that one entity includes or features songs that are original compositions rather than covers or adaptations.
  • E. hasVocalStyleComparedTo
    Indicates a comparison between entities based on the similarity or resemblance of their vocal style.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a52fa708190934a32308d2c92dc completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f659355a208190be2609ffc7a9c427 completed May 2, 2026, 8:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6575d89788190aca478e4aea05a65 completed May 2, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65875030881909007c502b7dcc998 completed May 2, 2026, 8:03 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:36 p.m.