Triple

T27770401
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject 2016–17 Serie A with Juventus FC E701727 entity
Predicate defensiveRecord P172122 FINISHED
Object best defence in Serie A 2016–17 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: best defence in Serie A 2016–17 | Statement: [2016–17 Serie A with Juventus FC, defensiveRecord, best defence in Serie A 2016–17]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defensiveRecord
Context triple: [2016–17 Serie A with Juventus FC, defensiveRecord, best defence in Serie A 2016–17]
  • A. defensiveSuccess
    Indicates that a defensive action successfully prevented or mitigated an opposing threat, attack, or adverse outcome.
  • B. defensiveSide
    Indicates which entity is acting in a defensive role or position relative to another entity or situation.
  • C. defensiveRole
    Indicates that an entity serves a protective or guarding function in relation to another entity or context.
  • D. defensiveStructure
    Indicates a relationship where one entity functions as a structure built or used to protect, defend, or fortify another entity or area.
  • E. usedDefensiveLine
    Indicates that an entity employed or deployed a particular defensive line as part of its strategy or actions.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a52fa708190934a32308d2c92dc completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a9603b208190b3533ea2b441514c completed May 3, 2026, 1:48 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6a751d5e48190a77dcecbe7ef9f0b completed May 3, 2026, 1:39 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6a8de0b948190ae333e9cd99cbf6c completed May 3, 2026, 1:46 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:34 p.m.