Triple
T27765270
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | CAF women’s club ranking |
E701583
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | football club ranking system |
C2808
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: football club ranking system Context triple: [CAF women’s club ranking, instanceOf, football club ranking system]
-
A.
sports ranking system
chosen
A sports ranking system is a structured method for evaluating and ordering teams or athletes based on performance metrics, results, and predefined rules to determine relative standings.
-
B.
UEFA coefficient
A UEFA coefficient is a numerical ranking system used by the Union of European Football Associations to evaluate and seed clubs and national teams based on their performance in European competitions over a rolling multi-year period.
-
C.
association football league system
An association football league system is a hierarchical structure of interconnected football leagues, typically organized by promotion and relegation, that determines the competitive levels and progression of clubs within a country or region.
-
D.
rugby union ranking system
A rugby union ranking system is a structured method for ordering national or club teams based on their relative performance, typically using match results, strength of opposition, and weighting factors to calculate comparative ratings over time.
-
E.
power ranking
A power ranking is an ordered list that subjectively rates entities (such as teams, players, or products) based on their perceived current strength or performance relative to one another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a52fa708190934a32308d2c92dc |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:30 p.m.