Triple

T27762081
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southeast Case E701494 entity
Predicate legalPrincipleDiscussed P187043 FINISHED
Object command responsibility LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: command responsibility | Statement: [Southeast Case, legalPrincipleDiscussed, command responsibility]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalPrincipleDiscussed
Context triple: [Southeast Case, legalPrincipleDiscussed, command responsibility]
  • A. legalConcept
    Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
  • B. legalDoctrine
    Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
  • C. legalPrecedentInvolved
    Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
  • D. legalCodeFocus
    Indicates that something is specifically concerned with, centered on, or primarily addressing a particular legal code or body of law.
  • E. hasLegalPrincipleInvoked chosen
    Indicates that a legal case, action, or decision relies on, cites, or is based upon a specific legal principle.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef6a5193808190816eb7d0020b2d87 completed April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcc4b700748190ae00b21d09c96695 completed May 7, 2026, 4:58 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcb0f9d3d881908a049475182fb039 completed May 7, 2026, 3:34 p.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:27 p.m.