Triple
T27755170
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | SysV semaphores |
E701316
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | counting semaphore mechanism |
C27870
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: counting semaphore mechanism Context triple: [SysV semaphores, instanceOf, counting semaphore mechanism]
-
A.
Concurrency mechanism
chosen
A concurrency mechanism is a construct or technique that coordinates the execution of multiple tasks or threads so they can safely and efficiently access shared resources without causing conflicts or inconsistencies.
-
B.
counting process
A counting process is a stochastic process that records the cumulative number of events that have occurred up to each point in time, typically increasing in integer-valued steps.
-
C.
counting technique
A counting technique is a systematic method used to determine the number of possible outcomes, arrangements, or selections in a given situation, often employing principles like addition, multiplication, permutations, and combinations.
-
D.
monitoring mechanism
A monitoring mechanism is a system or process that continuously observes, measures, and evaluates activities or conditions to detect deviations, ensure compliance, and support timely decision-making.
-
E.
logic for concurrent systems
Logic for concurrent systems is a formal framework for specifying and reasoning about the behaviors, interactions, and correctness properties of systems in which multiple processes execute and communicate simultaneously.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef6a5193808190816eb7d0020b2d87 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 1:53 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 4:23 p.m.